This solution confirms the principle that international treaties have more legal authority than all the other legal acts, with the exception of the Constitution. This article aims to give an insight on the constitutional provisions that regulate the position of international treaties in the Macedonian legal order. It identifies its advantages and shortcomings and offers some solutions that might be taken into account by the lawgiver in the future. The article also analyses the profound impact that the European Convention on Human Rights has exerted on the substantial nature of the catalogue of fundamental rights and freedoms prescribed in the Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia.
Keywords : Constitution; international treaty; ratification; hierarchy of norms; European Convention on Human Rights. In their attempts to create a viable constitutional organization of the state powers, after the collapse of the socialist system the new East European democracies, began to reinstall the universal values of the classical constitutional law the principle of the rule of law, the separation and balance of state powers among the legislature, the executive and judiciary, the political pluralism as the fundamental basis for a free and democratic society, free market economy etc.
These changes have also included the gradual opening of their internal legal systems and their adaptation to the dynamic developments in the European and international law. The protection of the human rights has been of profound importance in this context and it has become one of the most critical conditions for the new democracies in their accession to the new regional and global legal order De Schutter , , pp.
The contemporary constitutions regulate the relationship between the international legal order and the internal one and the procedures that ensure the compatibility between the legal norms of the two legal orders. This relationship is evidenced by the way constitutions achieve the process of incorporation of norms of international law in the domestic legal order Anastasi, , pp. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary that the norms of international law become part of the domestic law of a state.
From the legal-technical perspective, there are two constitutional modalities for the implementation of the international law in the national legal order: 1 the automatic internalization, i. The constitutional law determines the position of the norms of international law in the hierarchical structure of the internal constitutional order of a state. The relationship that an international treaty creates with the domestic law depends on the constitution of the state that has signed the respective treaty. Therefore, it is a necessity to refer to the constitutional norms of a specific state in order to draw valid conclusions on the relationship of the international and domestic law.
Gruda, , p. These provisions are located in the first part Fundamental provisions and the sixth part International relations. The former has a more general character and the latter a more specific one. For a general thematic treatment of the status of international law as well as the legal position of international treaties, including the legal position of the European Convention on Human Rights and Basic Freedoms in correlation with constitutional order of the Republic of Macedonia, Article 8 paragraph 1, clause 1 and 11 , as well as Article and of the Constitution of the RM, have a particular importance.
First, the fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen , recognized in international law and included in the Constitution Article 8, paragraph 1, clause 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia. This provision implies that the international law of human rights 4 has served as a measure as well as guiding pattern for the normative text of the Constitution of the RM in the regulation of the catalogue of fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen De Schutter, , pp.
The constitutional regulation of human rights and freedoms in post-communist Macedonia can be qualified and treated as unification of what is generally accepted as essential in most international instruments for human rights and in the constitutions of the majority of western countries.
Second, the respect for the generally accepted norms of international law is a fundamental value of the constitutional order of the Republic of Macedonia article 8, paragraph 1, clause 11 of the Constitution of the RM.
This means that the Republic of Macedonia has undertaken the duty to respect the sources of international law: 1 international treaties; 2 international customs; 3 the general principles of the law recognized by civilized nations; 4 judicial decisions; 5 the legal doctrine or teachings of the most highly qualified scholars of the various nations Brownlie, , pp. Moreover, the generally recognized norms of international law are: the UN Charter , the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , international conventions on human rights, international conventions that stipulate rules for the settlement of disputes among states; international conventions that prohibit genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity; the Statute of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal; the Statute of International Criminal Court signed in Rome in , etc.
Consequently, these norms cannot be altered with internal legal provisions, or with bilateral treaties. For instance, the bilateral treaty between the Republic of Macedonia and the USA signed in is null void from a legal perspective because, according to it, Macedonia assumed the obligation not to extradite members of US armed forces to the International Criminal Court in The Hague if they commit genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity Skaric, , p. Finally, the generally recognized norms of international law are the basis for the survival and development of the international community.
Hence, they are peremptory norms for all states, regardless of whether or not they accept them. These norms on one hand create the relationship between internal and international law, and on the other they influence the interdependence of democracy, nation-state and globalization Skaric, , p. This provision confirms the principle that the Constitution retains its legal superiority over all other legal acts, including international treaties ratified by an act of Parliament. Indeed, this constitutional solution gives to ratified international treaties more legal authority than all the other legal acts with the exception of the Constitution and these international treaties cannot be amended with other legislative acts.
Clearly, in the hierarchical structure of the constitutional order of the Republic of Macedonia, international treaties take a specific position; they are above legal acts, but below constitutional acts. Hence, inside the framework of the constitutional order of the Republic of Macedonia the legal force of international treaties is sub-constitutional and supra-statutory.
This means that international treaties have legal primacy over all legislative corpus of internal law of the state, including the existing legal acts and the future ones the principle of primacy of international treaties over national legislation Aust, , p.
Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts
This expression indicates that a court will not apply a legal act in a specific case because of its noncompliance with the provisions of an international treaty. In this context, every judge when confronted with laws he deems to be contrary to an international treaty, he is bound not to apply them, invoking instead the provisions of the international treaty.
Furthermore, the courts of the RM are entitled in specific cases to enforce the final and effective decisions of the European Court for Human Rights, the International Crime Tribunal or of any other court whose competence has been recognized by the Republic of Macedonia, provided that the respective decisions can be directly applied. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms adopted in by the Council of Europe and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are considered as internal sources of the constitutional law of the Republic of Macedonia, and as such they serve as mechanisms for the settlement of disputes between the Republic of Macedonia as state and its citizens, in cases when their rights and freedoms have been violated by final and enforceable decisions of the courts of the Republic of Macedonia.
A disadvantage of the Constitution of RM is that it does not expressly provide any competence to the Constitutional Court of the RM to review the constitutionality of laws that ratify international treaties. As a result, the Constitutional Court for more than a decade has rejected the initiatives for revision of the laws that ratify international treaties.
There is no doubt that the ex ante control by the Constitutional Court has a preventive function, since it prevents the unconstitutionality of the content of the international treaty, before its ratification by the Assembly. Another disadvantage of the Constitution of the RM is that it has not entitled the Constitutional Court with explicit competence to control the conventionality of statutes and other general legal acts.
Consequently, the Constitutional Court of the RM should offer legal protection to the international treaty by abrogating ex nunc or annulling ex tunc 11 the propositions of a specific statute when they infringe Article of the Constitution Saliu, , pp. Finally, another disadvantage of Article is that it can be applied only to ratified international treaties. This constitutional provision confirms that the competent state authorities to conclude international treaties on behalf of the Republic of Macedonia are: 1 the President of the state, and 2 the Government, in situations that are expressly determined by law.
The President of the RM is the primary subject for the conclusion of international treaties because he represents Macedonia internally and internationally and his treaty-making power is confirmed by the generally accepted norms of international law. Meanwhile, the Government of the RM is a complementary subject for the conclusion of international treaties, because it can conclude them only in the areas determined by law.
In fact, the Government of the RM can conclude international treaties in the areas of economy, finance, science, culture, education and sport, transport and communications, urbanism, construction and protection of environment, agriculture, forestry, hydro economy, healthcare, energetics, justice, labor and social policy, human rights, diplomatic and consular relations, defense and state security, except issues related to the borders of the RM, association in or dissociation from a union or community with other states, and other international treaties which according to international law, are concluded by head of states, the Assembly of the RM ratifies international treaties in the form of statute Article 68, paragraph 1, clause 6 of the Constitution of the RM.
To sum up, the transposition and implementation of international treaties in the constitutional order of the RM is realized through statutes The Government and the President of the RM are responsible for the enforcement of international treaties.
Customary International Law: Can UN Guidelines Affect Domestic Laws? | Council on Foreign Relations
The original copies of international treaties are registered and deposited in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia. By becoming party to international treaties through the process of signing and ratification, the Republic of Macedonia assumes obligations that it is bound to perform. According what has been said above, it can be concluded that the European Convention on Human Rights has an intermediary legal position between the Constitution and statutes, i. On the other hand, from a material perspective, it has an equivalent legal status with the Constitution.
This situation facilitates the work of judges when they rule on issues related to individual rights and freedoms because they can simultaneously invoke the symmetrically formulated articles from the Constitution and the Convention. Due to this, it appears perfectly obvious that the European Convention on Human Rights has exerted a profound impact on the substantial nature of the catalogue of fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the Constitution of the RM.
However, the act of signing did not immediately have operative legal force, but it confirmed the good will of the Republic of Macedonia to be part of the Council of Europe, and to verify its obligation to harmonize the national legislation with the standards and postulates of the Convention in a reasonable period of time. In the course of their work which lasted eight months, by applying the analytical approach and the comparative method from the perspective of the Convention and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the working group highlighted the necessary amendments to the Macedonian legislation.
This study confirms the enormous implications of the Convention for the constitutional order of the RM in general and for the mechanisms for the protection of human rights and freedoms in particular Greer, , pp. From that date the Convention became an organic component of the domestic legal order of the RM with the possibility of its direct application by the courts as an internal formal source of law.
As a matter of fact, Macedonian judges have not broken the myth of issuing their decisions only on the basis of statutes, without invoking the provisions of international conventions as well.
There is no doubt that in the practice of the Macedonian courts there is still considerable hesitation to refer their internal operations to international legal acts. As a consequence, unless the provisions of international treaties are invoked in the practice of the courts, they will remain only theoretical fictions without any meaning and value in the real life. This means that the status that international human rights law enjoys in a specific country does not depend only on the content of its constitutional norms but also on the commitment of the judiciary to implement them in practice.
This is best verified from Latin legal maxim: Applicatio est vitae regulae iuris The application is the life of a rule. The third step that the Republic of Macedonia took was the deposition of the instruments of the ratification to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on 10 April It is important to keep in mind the fact that the Council of Europe as the date of ratification of the Convention considers the time of the deposition of the instruments of ratification to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Article 66, paragraph 3 of the Convention and not the date when the national legal act for the ratification entered into force.
In the hierarchical structure of the constitutional order of the Republic of Macedonia, international treaties take a specific position; they are above statutory acts, but below constitutional acts. In case of a collision between a statute and a ratified international treaty, the provisions of the international treaty have primacy over the domestic law and international treaties invalidate internal laws if they do not comply with the respective international treaties. A disadvantage of the Macedonian Constitution is that it invokes only ratified international treaties, but not international treaties that are not subject to ratification from the Assembly or international custom.
Another disadvantage of the Constitution of RM is that it does not expressly provide any competence to the Constitutional Court of the RM to review the constitutionality of laws that ratify international treaties.
Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, Vol 10, No 3 (2014)
The author presents arguments against restricting the freedom of expression on the grounds of necessity or in order to respect the rights of others. Whilst Amy Shepherd does not argue that extremism legislation can never satisfy the high standards of international human rights law, she does provide a list of requirements, which need to be satisfied for domestic extremism legislation to be lawful.
- Janne E. Nijman and André Nollkaemper.
- Consensual (Club Imperial Book 1)!
- Domestic law and IHL!
- The Emperors Gambit [The Amazing Adventures of the Emperor #1];
- James: A 12-Week Study (Knowing the Bible).
- In this section.
The author argues that national judicial practice enriches the development of EU law. The author highlights the need for a regulatory regime in developing countries to complement the prohibitive regime in the major e-waste source countries. The author then examines these proposed measures in light of WTO rules and jurisprudence.
The authors argue that the ICJ has failed to foster nuclear disarmament within the international community. Aksamitowska, K. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law , 33 85 , pp. Aksamitowska K. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law.
Utrecht Journal of International and European Law , 33 85 , 1—4. Aksamitowska, Karolina. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 33 85 : 1—4. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 33, no.
Aksamitowska, K.. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law , vol.